Shining The Gentle Of Reality On Fossil Gasoline Insanity

Help CleanTechnica’s work by means of a Substack subscription or on Stripe.

A submit by Lloyd Alter, the sage of Toronto, caught my eye this morning. Alter, who was the face of Treehugger for over a decade, paid tribute to the late economist and physicist Robert Ayers by reposting a bit of Alter’s e book The Story Of Carbon Upfront, which places a highlight on fossil fuels. Citing Ayers, Alter wrote,

“The financial system is actually a system for extracting, processing and reworking power as assets into power embodied in services and products,” Ayers mentioned. Alter constructed on that by saying in his e book, “the aim of the financial system is to show power into stuff.”

Ayres doesn’t have a lot time for conventional economics, Alter mentioned at present, however he teaches us that economics is topic to the legal guidelines of thermodynamics, which may be very handy when considering of power and carbon. Ayers wrote, “The primary legislation of thermodynamics, conservation of mass/power, says (amongst different issues that every one industrial processes — extraction, discount, synthesis, shaping and forming — generate waste residuals. The mass of residuals from industrial exercise far exceeds the mass of supplies.”

“These financial processes devour power and switch it into items and companies, waste warmth, upfront carbon emissions, and ultimately landfill. So these of us who name for fixing issues as an alternative of shopping for new, of shopping for much less, of utilizing much less stuff on our buildings and our lives, will not be doing our foremost financial operate: consuming power within the type of items and companies,” Alter writes. “Funding in renewable power creates jobs, however then these photo voltaic panels simply sit there producing energy, whereas with fossil fuels, you all the time should dig up extra stuff.”

“Burning stuff creates wealth, and never only for the oil corporations. All of us play a job on this in our constructing, shopping for, or promoting all the pieces made with power. The waste, the CO2, it’s a part of the deal,” Alter mentioned. He cites Allison Bailes, who mentioned, “Because it seems, we’ve identified this limitation for practically 200 years. A French child named Sadi Carnot discovered that there’s a restrict on the effectivity of warmth engines.”

In his graphic novel Vitality Slaves about Buckminster Fuller, Stuart MacMillan mentioned, “Bucky noticed that coal, oil, and gasoline have been batteries for historic sunshine that allowed civilization to, for the primary time, dwell past its photo voltaic earnings.” That’s a really fascinating perception. All fossil fuels are noting greater than saved daylight. By necessity, extracting and burning them provides to the quantity of photo voltaic power the Earth receives day-after-day. Is it any surprise the Earth’s atmosphere is destabilized by the addition of that further power?

Losing Vitality Is Huge Enterprise

Utilizing information from 2023, the Lawrence Livermore Nationwide Laboratory created a graphic that exhibits how the US makes use of power. The numbers are in quads, outlined as one quadrillion British Thermal Items. The US used about 94 quads of power in 2023. 28 quads have been consumed by the transportation sector, however of these, solely 5.87 quads — about 21% — have been transformed into ahead progress. Meaning 79% was wasted as warmth, carbon dioxide, and different exhaust emissions like oxides of nitrogen or sulfur, and advantageous particulate matter.

Alter provides that absolutely 15% of all of the power consumed for industrial functions — 4 quads utilizing the Livermore numbers — is used for refining petroleum merchandise. Add all of it up, and as Stanford College estimates, we’re getting at most 10 to 12% effectivity out of the gasoline enter that strikes our automobiles ahead.

“The ICE-powered vehicle is the world’s best software for changing power into cash for oil corporations, governments, highway builders and builders. The truth that it’s only 10% environment friendly is a function, not a bug; the extra oil burned, the extra money made. Because of this the power transition is so troublesome and takes so lengthy,” Alter mentioned.

This week within the Monetary Occasions, Dieter Helm, professor of financial coverage at Oxford College, commented on the rise in the usage of coal recently, largely to feed the voracious urge for food of information facilities. “Coal is evil stuff, from an environmental standpoint,” he wrote. “However from an financial perspective, it’s fantastically low-cost, it’s extensively accessible, it may be stockpiled actually simply, and it produces actually intense warmth.”

He mentioned the mad rush for extra electrical energy means the world merely wants extra of all the pieces — extra renewables, extra nuclear, and extra oil, gasoline, and coal. “Very sadly, there isn’t a transition” away from fossil fuels and in the direction of renewable power, he mentioned. As an alternative, it is a rise, in all instructions.

That final sentence is what prompted Invoice McKibben to write down not too long ago, “So the aim for the remainder of us, as we resist Trump and resist local weather change, is fairly clear — do all the pieces we are able to to hurry up this transition to wash power, right here and in every single place. Photo voltaic works, photo voltaic is affordable, and photo voltaic is liberating.”

He added, “Occam’s Razor … would lead us to say that many issues the Trump administration does are merely designed to waste power, as a result of that’s good for the incumbent producers, i.e. Huge Oil. That’s not a very subtle rule for understanding their actions, however bear in mind: Trump was bankrolled by the fossil gasoline business, and that business has all the time wished us to waste power.” McKibben was not the primary to make that remark. George Carlin informed us they similar factor a few years in the past when he mentioned, “The USA is an oil firm with weapons.”

Oil & Fuel Subsidies

This week, Oil Change Worldwide launched a report by which it claims “the federal authorities at the moment palms the fossil gasoline business an estimated $34.8 billion every year in direct subsidies, a determine that’s probably conservative resulting from an absence of accessible, dependable information. It excludes tens of billions of annual state, county, and municipal subsidies for fossil gasoline manufacturing in addition to federal assist within the type of worldwide public finance, navy expenditures to guard fossil gasoline provide or markets, or environmental and well being prices of fossil gasoline air pollution.”

“Fossil gasoline corporations, which spend hundreds of thousands yearly to rig our political system of their favor, obtain a 30,000 p.c return on funding within the types of tax breaks, direct appropriations, low-cost entry to public lands, and different handouts from the federal authorities,” OCI says.

Readers might know that the Worldwide Financial Fund places the price of direct and oblique fossil gasoline subsidies at round $6 trillion {dollars}, and all to guard an business that wastes as a lot as 90% of the power it supplies. That is madness on a worldwide scale. Robert Reich at present has his personal tackle this insanity.

APS Ditches Clear Vitality Pledges

Readers typically ask, What does any of this should do with clear tech? The reply is, in at present’s hyper-partisan world, politics infects each side of day by day life. Final month, throughout the second quarter earnings name, Arizona Public Service introduced it might rescind its earlier clear power commitments, get rid of its 2030 targets of 65% clear and 45% renewable power, and abandon its earlier dedication to realize a zero-carbon system by 2050. APS additionally said that it’s eliminating all earlier “interim” clear power targets it had deliberate to realize earlier than 2050.

This announcement leaves Arizona’s largest utility with no dedication to get rid of carbon emissions and solely about 21% of its present power portfolio coming from renewable power. Immediately’s announcement is a reversal from years of public commitments to a clear power transition that APS beforehand made in its Built-in Useful resource Plans and in different public statements.

The transfer prompted the Sierra Membership to say in a weblog submit, “This announcement leaves Arizona’s largest utility with no dedication to get rid of carbon emissions and solely about 21 p.c of its present power portfolio coming from renewable power. Immediately’s announcement is a reversal from years of public commitments to a clear power transition that APS beforehand made in its Built-in Useful resource Plans and in different public statements.”

So why would APS do that? As a result of the Vitality Division beneath the management of Chris Wright is pounding the drum for extra coal, extra gasoline, extra nuclear — something however photo voltaic and wind. However that is unnecessary. Everyone knows renewables are the most cost effective supply of recent power, and we assume, based mostly on what everyone knows about Adam Smith’s unseen hand, that being the least costly various ought to make them the primary alternative for all.

However that evaluation omits the purpose Lloyd Alter made, which is that losing power is exactly what the power corporations need us to do. It’s the idea of their monumental income and they’re going to do something to forestall an interruption of their income stream.

There’s little or no we as people can do aside from vote the crazies out of workplace. However we are able to select to spend our cash on photo voltaic and battery storage, we are able to select to drive on electrons as an alternative of molecules, we are able to convert to warmth pumps to warmth and funky our properties and warmth our water, and we are able to take part in demand response packages if our native utility gives them.

We will make a distinction, regardless of how small our contribution to a extra sustainable world. Chris Wright can browbeat APS into backing away from its clear power guarantees however he can’t stop us from making particular person decisions that align with our values. Our voices can affect others, if we allow them to be heard.