North American corporations lag their counterparts world wide in the usage of higher-quality Scope 3 knowledge, a survey of greater than 1,200 professionals from near 100 nations reveals.
The survey, carried out by the MIT Sustainable Provide Chain Lab, included responses from professionals working in provide chain, procurement, logistics, operations and sustainability.
Half of all respondents in North America reported counting on essentially the most primary type of knowledge on value-chain emissions — {industry} averages or spend-based estimates — in comparison with simply over a 3rd in Europe.
Use of knowledge sourced direct from suppliers, which is mostly extra correct, additionally confirmed regional variations: 28 p.c of European companies reported utilizing provider knowledge, greater than 10 share factors greater than the speed in North America.
Knowledge sources for Scope 3 measurement


The distinction stems from the elements driving sustainability within the two areas, stated Sreedevi Rajagopalan, an MIT analysis scientist and an writer of the report.
European corporations’ sustainability initiatives are extra strongly formed by regulation, significantly the EU’s Company Sustainability Reporting Directive, which requires standardized disclosures and better transparency. These regulatory pressures have pushed European firms to put money into customized instruments and supplier-level knowledge assortment.
In distinction, North American corporations are primarily pushed by traders and board priorities, which may be glad utilizing spend-based estimates and {industry} averages.
“These strategies are faster and supply broad comparability—though they’re much less exact,” added Rajagopalan. “The trade-off is that spend-based and industry-average approaches can obscure actual supplier-level enhancements and generally even disincentivize sustainability investments. Firms utilizing extra detailed provider knowledge not solely obtain extra correct emissions estimates but additionally strengthen provider engagement and uncover new alternatives for emissions discount.”