It was a Monday afternoon in June 2023 when Rita Meier, 45, joined us for a video name. Meier informed us in regards to the final time she stated goodbye to her husband, Stefan, 5 years earlier. He had been leaving their dwelling close to Lake Constance, Germany, heading for a commerce truthful in Milan.
Meier recalled how he hesitated between taking his Tesla Mannequin S or her BMW. He had by no means pushed the Tesla that far earlier than. He checked the route for charging stations alongside the best way and finally determined to attempt it. Rita had a nasty feeling. She stayed dwelling with their three kids, the youngest lower than a yr outdated.
At 3.18pm on 10 Could 2018, Stefan Meier misplaced management of his Mannequin S on the A2 freeway close to the Monte Ceneri tunnel. Travelling at about 100kmh (62mph), he ploughed by way of a number of warning markers and site visitors indicators earlier than crashing right into a slanted guardrail. “The collision with the guardrail launches the automobile into the air, the place it flips a number of instances earlier than touchdown,” investigators would write later.
The automobile got here to relaxation greater than 70 metres away, on the other aspect of the street, leaving a path of wreckage. In response to witnesses, the Mannequin S burst into flames whereas nonetheless airborne. A number of passersby tried to open the doorways and rescue the driving force, however they couldn’t unlock the automobile. Once they heard explosions and noticed flames by way of the home windows, they retreated. Even the firefighters, who arrived 20 minutes later, might do nothing however watch the Tesla burn.
At that second, Rita Meier was unaware of the crash. She tried calling her husband, however he didn’t decide up. When he nonetheless hadn’t returned her name hours later – extremely uncommon for this devoted father – she tried to trace his automobile utilizing Tesla’s app. It now not labored. By the point cops rang her doorbell late that evening, Meier was already bracing for the worst.
The crash made headlines the subsequent morning as one of many first deadly Tesla accidents in Europe. Tesla launched an announcement to the press saying the corporate was “deeply saddened” by the incident, including, “We’re working to assemble all of the info on this case and are absolutely cooperating with native authorities.”
To today, Meier nonetheless doesn’t know why her husband died. She has stored every part the police gave her after their inconclusive investigation. The charred wreck of the Mannequin S sits in a storage Meier rents particularly for that objective. The scorched cellphone – which she had forensically analysed at her personal expense, to no avail – sits in a drawer at dwelling. Possibly sometime all this will probably be wanted once more, she says. She hasn’t given up hope of uncovering the reality.
Rita Meier was one in all many individuals who reached out to us after we started reporting on the Tesla Information – a cache of 23,000 leaked paperwork and 100 gigabytes of confidential information shared by an nameless whistleblower. The primary report we revealed checked out issues with Tesla’s autopilot system, which permits the automobiles to briefly drive on their very own, taking on steering, braking and acceleration. Although touted by the corporate as “Full Self-Driving” (FSD), it’s designed to help, not change, the driving force, who ought to preserve their eyes on the street and be able to intervene at any time.
Autonomous driving is the core promise round which Elon Musk has constructed his firm. Tesla has by no means delivered a really self-driving automobile, but the richest individual on the earth retains repeating the declare that his automobiles will quickly drive fully with out human assist. Is Tesla’s autopilot actually as superior as he says?
The Tesla Information counsel in any other case. They include greater than 2,400 buyer complaints about unintended acceleration and greater than 1,500 braking points – 139 involving emergency braking with out trigger, and 383 phantom braking occasions triggered by false collision warnings. Greater than 1,000 crashes are documented. A separate spreadsheet on driver-assistance incidents the place prospects raised security considerations lists greater than 3,000 entries. The oldest date from 2015, the latest from March 2022. In that point, Tesla delivered roughly 2.6m automobiles with autopilot software program. Most incidents occurred within the US, however there have additionally been complaints from Europe and Asia. Prospects described their automobiles all of a sudden accelerating or braking onerous. Some escaped with a scare; others ended up in ditches, crashing into partitions or colliding with oncoming automobiles. “After dropping my son off in his college parking zone, as I am going to make a right-hand exit it lurches ahead all of a sudden,” one grievance learn. One other stated, “My autopilot failed/malfunctioned this morning (automobile didn’t brake) and I nearly rear-ended any individual at 65mph.” A 3rd reported, “At this time, whereas my spouse was driving with our child within the automobile, it all of a sudden accelerated out of nowhere.”
Braking for no motive brought on simply as a lot misery. “Our automobile simply stopped on the freeway. That was terrifying,” a Tesla driver wrote. One other complained, “Frequent phantom braking on two-lane highways. Makes the autopilot nearly unusable.” Some report their automobile “jumped lanes unexpectedly”, inflicting them to hit a concrete barrier, or veered into oncoming site visitors.
Musk has given the world many causes to criticise him since he teamed up with Donald Trump. Many individuals do – principally by boycotting his merchandise. However whereas it’s one factor to disagree with the political opinions of a enterprise chief, it’s one other to be mortally afraid of his merchandise. Within the Tesla Information, we discovered hundreds of examples of why such worry could also be justified.
We got down to match a few of these incidents of autopilot errors with prospects’ names. Like tons of of different Tesla prospects, Rita Meier entered the automobile identification variety of her husband’s Mannequin S into the response kind we revealed on the web site of the German enterprise newspaper Handelsblatt, for which we carried out our investigation. She shortly found that the Tesla Information contained information associated to the automobile. In her first e-mail to us, she wrote, “You may most likely think about what it felt wish to learn that.”
There isn’t a lot data – simply an Excel spreadsheet titled “Incident Assessment”. A Tesla worker famous that the mileage counter on Stefan Meier’s automobile stood at 4,765 miles on the time of the crash. The entry was catalogued simply sooner or later after the deadly accident. Within the remark area was written, “Car concerned in an accident.” The reason for the crash stays unknown to today. In Tesla’s inside system, an organization worker had marked the case as “resolved”, however for 5 years, Rita Meier had been trying to find solutions. After Stefan’s dying, she took over the household enterprise – a timber firm with 200 staff primarily based in Tettnang, Baden-Württemberg. As journalists, we’re used to powerful interviews, however this one was totally different. We needed to strike a cautious stability – between empathy and the persistent questioning good reporting calls for. “Why are you satisfied the Tesla was answerable for your husband’s dying?” we requested her. “Isn’t it attainable he was distracted – possibly taking a look at his cellphone?”
Nobody is aware of for certain. However Meier was nicely conscious that Musk has beforehand claimed Tesla “releases important crash information affecting public security instantly and at all times will”; that he has bragged many instances about how its superior dealing with of knowledge units the corporate aside from its opponents. Within the case of her husband, why was she anticipated to consider there was no information?
Meier’s account was structured and exact. Solely as soon as did the toll grow to be seen – when she described how her husband’s physique burned in full view of the firefighters. Her eyes full of tears and her voice cracked. She apologised, turning away. After she collected herself, she informed us she has nothing left to achieve – but additionally nothing to lose. That was why she had reached out to us. We promised to look into the case.
Rita Meier wasn’t the one widow to method us. Disenchanted prospects, present and former staff, analysts and attorneys have been sharing hyperlinks to our reporting. A lot of them contacted us. Greater than as soon as, somebody wrote that it was about time somebody stood as much as Tesla – and to Elon Musk.
Meier, too, shared our articles and the callout kind with others in her community – together with individuals who, like her, misplaced family members in Tesla crashes. One in all them was Anke Schuster. Like Meier, she had misplaced her husband in a Tesla crash that defies rationalization and had spent years chasing solutions. And, like Meier, she had discovered her husband’s Mannequin X listed within the Tesla Information. As soon as once more, the incident was marked as resolved – with no indication of what that really meant.
“My husband died in an unexplained and inexplicable accident,” Schuster wrote in her first e-mail. Her dealings with police, prosecutors and insurance coverage firms, she stated, had been “hell”. Nobody appeared to grasp how a Tesla works. “I misplaced my husband. His 4 daughters misplaced their father. And nobody ever cared.”
Her husband, Oliver, was a tech fanatic, fascinated by Musk. A hotelier by commerce, he owned no fewer than 4 Teslas. He liked the automobiles. She hated them – particularly the autopilot. The way in which the software program appeared to make choices by itself by no means sat proper together with her. Now, she felt as if her instincts had been confirmed within the worst means.
Oliver Schuster was getting back from a enterprise assembly on 13 April 2021 when his black Mannequin X veered off freeway B194 between Loitz and Schönbeck in north-east Germany. It was 12.50pm when the automobile left the street and crashed right into a tree. Schuster began to fret when her husband missed a scheduled financial institution appointment. She tried to trace the automobile however discovered no option to find it. Even calling Tesla led nowhere. That night, the police broke the information: after the crash her husband’s automobile had burst into flames. He had burned to dying – with the hearth brigade watching helplessly.
The crashes that killed Meier’s and Schuster’s husbands have been nearly three years aside however the parallels have been chilling. We examined accident reviews, eyewitness accounts, crash-site photographs and correspondence with Tesla. In each instances, investigators had requested automobile information from Tesla, and the corporate hadn’t offered it. In Meier’s case, Tesla workers claimed no information was accessible. In Schuster’s, they stated there was no related information.
Over the subsequent two years, we spoke with crash victims, grieving households and specialists all over the world. What we uncovered was an ominous black field – a system designed not solely to gather and management each byte of buyer information, however to safeguard Musk’s imaginative and prescient of autonomous driving. Essential data was sealed off from public scrutiny.
Elon Musk is a perfectionist with an inclination in direction of micromanagement. At Tesla, his whims appear to override each argument – even in issues of life and dying. Throughout our reporting, we got here throughout the difficulty of door handles. On Teslas, they retract into the doorways whereas the automobiles are being pushed. The system will depend on battery energy. If an airbag deploys, the doorways are purported to unlock robotically and the handles prolong – at the very least, that’s what the Mannequin S guide says.
The concept for the smooth, futuristic design stems from Musk himself. He insisted on retractable handles, regardless of repeated warnings from engineers. Since 2018, they’ve been linked to at the very least 4 deadly accidents in Europe and the US, by which 5 individuals died.
In February 2024, we reported on a very tragic case: a deadly crash on a rustic street close to Dobbrikow, in Brandenburg, Germany. Two 18-year-olds have been killed when the Tesla they have been in slammed right into a tree and caught fireplace. First responders couldn’t open the doorways as a result of the handles have been retracted. The youngsters burned to dying within the again seat.
A court-appointed knowledgeable from Dekra, one in all Germany’s main testing authorities, later concluded that, given the retracted handles, the incident “qualifies as a malfunction”. In response to the report, “the failure of the rear door handles to increase robotically should be thought of a decisive issue” within the deaths. Had the system labored as meant, “it’s assumed that rescuers may need been in a position to extract the 2 backseat passengers earlier than the hearth developed additional”. With out what the report calls a “failure of this security operate”, the teenagers may need survived.
Our investigation made waves. The Kraftfahrt-Bundesamt, Germany’s federal motor transport authority, received concerned and introduced plans to coordinate with different regulatory our bodies to revise worldwide security requirements. Germany’s largest car membership, ADAC, issued a public suggestion that Tesla drivers ought to carry emergency window hammers. In an announcement, ADAC warned that retractable door handles might critically hinder rescue efforts. Even skilled emergency responders, it stated, could battle to achieve trapped passengers. Tesla exhibits no intention of adjusting the design.
That’s Musk. He prefers the smooth look of Teslas with out handles, so he accepts the chance to his prospects. His considering, it appears, goes one thing like this: sooner or later, the engineers will work out a technical repair. The identical logic applies to his grander imaginative and prescient of autonomous driving: as a result of Musk needs to be first, he lets prospects take a look at his unfinished Autopilot system on public roads. It’s a precept borrowed from the software program world, the place releasing apps in beta has lengthy been commonplace observe. The extra customers, the extra suggestions and, over time – usually years – one thing steady emerges. Income and market share arrive a lot earlier. The motto: in the event you wait, you lose.
Musk has taken that mindset to the street. The world is his lab. Everybody else is a part of the experiment.
By the tip of 2023, we knew lots about how Musk’s automobiles labored – however the best way they deal with information nonetheless felt like a black field. How is that information saved? At what second does the onboard pc ship it to Tesla’s servers? We talked to impartial specialists on the Technical College Berlin. Three PhD candidates – Christian Werling, Niclas Kühnapfel and Hans Niklas Jacob – made headlines for hacking Tesla’s autopilot {hardware}. A short voltage drop on a circuit board turned out to be simply sufficient to trick the system into opening up.
The safety researchers uncovered what they known as “Elon Mode” – a hidden setting by which the automobile drives absolutely autonomously, with out requiring the driving force to maintain his arms on the wheel. Additionally they managed to get better deleted information, together with video footage recorded by a Tesla driver. They usually traced precisely what information Tesla sends to its servers – and what it doesn’t.
The hackers defined that Tesla shops information in three locations. First, on a reminiscence card contained in the onboard pc – primarily a working log of the automobile’s digital mind. Second, on the occasion information recorder – a black field that captures a couple of seconds earlier than and after a crash. And third, on Tesla’s servers, assuming the automobile uploads them.
The researchers informed us they’d discovered an inside database embedded within the system – one constructed round so-called set off occasions. If, for instance, the airbag deploys or the automobile hits an impediment, the system is designed to avoid wasting an outlined set of knowledge to the black field – and transmit it to Tesla’s servers. Except the automobiles have been in a whole community useless zone, in each the Meier and Schuster instances, the automobiles ought to have recorded and transmitted that information.
Who within the firm really works with that information? We examined testimony from Tesla staff in courtroom instances associated to deadly crashes. They described how their departments function. We cross-referenced their statements with entries within the Tesla Information. A sample took form: one crew screens all crashes at a excessive stage, forwarding them to specialists – some targeted on autopilot, others on automobile dynamics or street grip. There’s additionally a bunch that steps in every time authorities request crash information.
after e-newsletter promotion
We compiled an inventory of staff related to our reporting. Some we tried to achieve by e-mail or cellphone. For others, we confirmed up at their properties. In the event that they weren’t there, we left handwritten notes. Nobody needed to speak.
We looked for different crashes. One concerned Hans von Ohain, a 33-year-old Tesla worker from Evergreen, Colorado. On 16 Could 2022, he crashed right into a tree on his means dwelling from a golf outing and the automobile burst into flames. Von Ohain died on the scene. His passenger survived and informed police that von Ohain, who had been ingesting, had activated Full Self-Driving. Tesla, nevertheless, stated it couldn’t affirm whether or not the system was engaged – as a result of no automobile information was transmitted for the incident.
Then, in February 2024, Musk himself stepped in. The Tesla CEO claimed von Ohain had by no means downloaded the most recent model of the software program – so it couldn’t have brought on the crash. Associates of von Ohain, nevertheless, informed US media he had proven them the system. His passenger that day, who barely escaped along with his life, informed reporters that hours earlier the automobile had already pushed erratically by itself. “The primary time it occurred, I used to be like, ‘Is that ordinary?’” he recalled asking von Ohain. “And he was like, ‘Yeah, that occurs now and again.’”
His account was bolstered by von Ohain’s widow, who defined to the media how overjoyed her husband had been at working for Tesla. Reportedly, von Ohain obtained the Full Self-Driving system as a perk. His widow defined how he would use the system nearly each time he received behind the wheel: “It was jerky, however we have been like, that comes with the territory of recent know-how. We knew the know-how needed to study, and we have been prepared to be a part of that.”
The Colorado State Patrol investigated however closed the case with out blaming Tesla. It reported that no usable information was recovered.
For an organization that markets its automobiles as computer systems on wheels, Tesla’s declare that it had no information accessible in all these instances is stunning. Musk has lengthy described Tesla automobiles as a part of a collective neural community – machines that repeatedly study from each other. Consider the Borg aliens from the Star Trek franchise. Musk envisions his automobiles, just like the Borg, as a collective – working as a hive thoughts, every automobile linked to a unified consciousness.
When a journalist requested him in October 2015 what made Tesla’s driver-assistance system totally different, he replied, “The entire Tesla fleet operates as a community. When one automobile learns one thing, all of them study it. That’s past what different automobile firms are doing.” Each Tesla driver, he defined, turns into a type of “knowledgeable coach for the way the autopilot ought to work”.
In response to Musk, the eight cameras in each Tesla transmit greater than 160bn video frames a day to the corporate’s servers. In its proprietor’s guide, Tesla states that its automobiles could acquire much more: “analytics, street phase, diagnostic and automobile utilization information”, all despatched to headquarters to enhance product high quality and options akin to autopilot. The corporate claims it learns “from the expertise of billions of miles that Tesla automobiles have pushed”.
It’s a highly effective promise: a fleet of tens of millions of automobiles, always feeding uncooked data right into a gargantuan processing centre. Billions – trillions – of knowledge factors, all in service of 1 objective: making automobiles drive higher and conserving drivers protected. At the beginning of this yr, Musk received an opportunity to point out the world what he meant.
On 1 January 2025, at 8.39am, a Tesla Cybertruck exploded exterior the Trump Worldwide Resort Las Vegas. The person behind the incident – US particular forces veteran Matthew Livelsberger – had rented the automobile, packed it with fireworks, gasoline canisters and grenades, and parked it in entrance of the constructing. Simply earlier than the explosion, he shot himself within the head with a .50 calibre Desert Eagle pistol. “This was not a terrorist assault, it was a wakeup name. Individuals solely take note of spectacles and violence,” Livelsberger wrote in a letter later discovered by authorities. “What higher option to get my level throughout than a stunt with fireworks and explosives.”
The soldier miscalculated. Seven bystanders suffered minor accidents. The Cybertruck was destroyed, however not even the home windows of the lodge shattered. As a substitute, along with his remaining act, Livelsberger revealed one thing else fully: simply how far the arm of Tesla’s information equipment can attain. “The entire Tesla senior crew is investigating this matter proper now,” Musk wrote on X simply hours after the blast. “Will put up extra data as quickly as we study something. We’ve by no means seen something like this.”
Later that day, Musk posted once more. Tesla had already analysed all related information – and was prepared to supply conclusions. “We now have now confirmed that the explosion was attributable to very massive fireworks and/or a bomb carried within the mattress of the rented Cybertruck and is unrelated to the automobile itself,” he wrote. “All automobile telemetry was optimistic on the time of the explosion.”
Immediately, Musk wasn’t only a CEO; he was an investigator. He instructed Tesla technicians to remotely unlock the scorched automobile. He handed over inside footage captured up to date of detonation.The Tesla CEO had turned a suicide assault right into a showcase of his superior know-how.
But there have been critics even within the second of glory. “It reveals the type of sweeping surveillance happening,” warned David Choffnes, government director of the Cybersecurity and Privateness Institute at Northeastern College in Boston, when contacted by a reporter. “When one thing unhealthy occurs, it’s useful, nevertheless it’s a double-edged sword. Firms that acquire this information can abuse it.”
There are different examples of what Tesla’s information assortment makes attainable. We discovered the case of David and Sheila Brown, who died in August 2020 when their Mannequin 3 ran a purple mild at 114mph in Saratoga, California. Investigators managed to reconstruct each element, due to Tesla’s automobile information. It exhibits precisely when the Browns opened a door, unfastened a seatbelt, and the way onerous the driving force pressed the accelerator – all the way down to the millisecond, proper up to date of impression. Over time, we discovered extra instances, extra detailed accident reviews. The info positively is there – till it isn’t.
In lots of crashes when Teslas inexplicably veered off the street or hit stationary objects, investigators didn’t really request information from the corporate. Once we requested authorities why, there was usually silence. Our impression was that many prosecutors and cops weren’t even conscious that asking was an choice. In different instances, they acted solely when pushed by victims’ households.
Within the Meier case, Tesla informed authorities, in a letter dated 25 June 2018, that the final full set of car information was transmitted practically two weeks earlier than the crash. The one information from the day of the accident was a “restricted snapshot of car parameters” – taken “roughly 50 minutes earlier than the incident”. Nonetheless, this snapshot “doesn’t present something in relation to the incident”. As for the black field, Tesla warned that the storage modules have been probably destroyed, given the situation of the burned-out automobile. Information transmission after a crash is feasible, the corporate stated – however on this case, it didn’t occur. Ultimately, investigators couldn’t even decide whether or not driver-assist techniques have been energetic on the time of the crash.
The Schuster case performed out equally. Prosecutors in Stralsund, Germany, have been baffled. The street the place the crash occurred is straight, the asphalt was dry and the climate on the time of the accident was clear. Anke Schuster stored urging the authorities to look at Tesla’s telemetry information.
When prosecutors did formally request the information recorded by Schuster’s automobile on the day of the crash, it took Tesla greater than two weeks to reply – and when it did, the reply was each transient and daring. The corporate didn’t say there was no information. It stated that there was “no related information”. The authorities’ response left us surprised. We anticipated prosecutors to push again – to inform Tesla that deciding what’s related is their job, not the corporate’s. However they didn’t. As a substitute, they closed the case.
The hackers from TU Berlin pointed us to a examine by the Netherlands Forensic Institute, an impartial division of the ministry of justice and safety. In October 2021, the NFI revealed findings displaying it had efficiently accessed the onboard recollections of all main Tesla fashions. The researchers in contrast their outcomes with accident instances by which police had requested information from Tesla. Their conclusion was that whereas Tesla formally complied with these requests, it omitted massive volumes of knowledge which may have proved helpful.
Tesla’s credibility took an additional hit in a report launched by the US Nationwide Freeway Visitors Security Administration in April 2024. The company concluded that Tesla didn’t adequately monitor whether or not drivers stay alert and able to intervene whereas utilizing its driver-assist techniques. It reviewed 956 crashes, area information and buyer communications, and pointed to “gaps in Tesla’s telematic information” that made it unimaginable to find out how usually autopilot was energetic throughout crashes. If a automobile’s antenna was broken or it crashed in an space with out community protection, even severe accidents generally went unreported. Tesla’s inside statistics embody solely these crashes by which an airbag or different pyrotechnic system deployed – one thing that happens in simply 18% of police-reported instances. Because of this the precise accident charge is considerably larger than Tesla discloses to prospects and traders.
There’s extra. Two years prior, the NHTSA had flagged one thing unusual – one thing suspicious. In a separate report, it documented 16 instances by which Tesla automobiles crashed into stationary emergency automobiles. In every, autopilot disengaged “lower than one second earlier than impression” – far too little time for the driving force to react. Critics warn that this behaviour might enable Tesla to argue in courtroom that autopilot was not energetic in the meanwhile of impression, probably dodging accountability.
The YouTuber Mark Rober, a former engineer at Nasa, replicated this behaviour in an experiment on 15 March 2025. He simulated a variety of hazardous conditions, by which the Mannequin Y carried out considerably worse than a competing automobile. The Tesla repeatedly ran over a crash-test dummy with out braking. The video went viral, amassing greater than 14m views inside a couple of days.
The true shock got here after the experiment. Fred Lambert, who writes for the weblog Electrek, identified the identical autopilot disengagement that the NHTSA had documented. “Autopilot seems to robotically disengage a fraction of a second earlier than the impression because the crash turns into inevitable,” Lambert famous.
And so the doubts about Tesla’s integrity pile up. Within the Tesla Information, we discovered emails and reviews from a UK-based engineer who led Tesla’s Security Incident Investigation programme, overseeing the corporate’s most delicate crash instances. His inside memos reveal that Tesla intentionally restricted documentation of explicit points to keep away from the chance of this data being requested below subpoena. Though he pushed for clearer protocols and higher inside processes, US management resisted – explicitly pushed by fears of authorized publicity.
We contacted Tesla a number of instances with questions in regards to the firm’s information practices. We requested in regards to the Meier and Schuster instances – and what it means when deadly crashes are marked “resolved” in Tesla’s inside system. We requested the corporate to answer criticism from the US site visitors authority and to the findings of Dutch forensic investigators. We additionally requested why Tesla doesn’t merely publish crash information, as Musk as soon as promised to do, and whether or not the corporate considers it applicable to withhold data from potential US courtroom orders. Tesla has not responded to any of our questions.
Elon Musk boasts in regards to the huge quantity of knowledge his automobiles generate – information that, he claims, is not going to solely enhance Tesla’s complete fleet but additionally revolutionise street site visitors. However, as now we have witnessed many times in essentially the most important of instances, Tesla refuses to share it.
Tesla’s dealing with of crash information impacts even those that by no means needed something to do with the corporate. Each street person trusts the automobile in entrance, behind or beside them to not be a risk. Does that belief nonetheless stand when the automobile is driving itself?
Internally, we known as our investigation into Tesla’s crash information Black Field. At first, as a result of it handled the bodily information items constructed into the automobiles – so-called black packing containers. However the units Tesla installs hardly deserve the title. Not like the flight recorders utilized in aviation, they’re not fireproof – and in lots of the instances we examined, they proved ineffective.
Over time, we got here to see that the title held a second which means. A black field, in frequent parlance, is one thing closed to the skin. One thing opaque. Unknowable. And whereas we’ve gained some perception into Tesla as an organization, its dealing with of crash information stays simply that: a black field. Solely Tesla is aware of how Elon Musk’s automobiles really work. But at the moment, greater than 5m of them share our roads.
Some names have been modified.
