GitHub vs. Bitbucket
GitHub isn’t the one hosted enhanced Git service, and GitHub Enterprise isn’t the one on-premises product for corporations. Atlassian Bitbucket competes with each of them, with barely decrease pricing and with a free five-member staff stage that features limitless non-public repos and the usage of Bitbucket Pipelines for steady integration. GitHub is a extra in style web site for open supply initiatives and it has a a lot bigger pool of open supply builders. Bitbucket’s pricing was extra favorable for small startups. Now that GitHub permits limitless non-public repos on free and staff accounts, that’s not the case.
GitHub vs. GitLab
GitLab competes with each GitHub and Bitbucket, each hosted and on-premises. On the floor, GitLab seems to have extra lifecycle performance than the others, however the distinction from Bitbucket principally disappears when you embrace Jira while you consider Bitbucket. GitLab presents Gold-plan cloud options to open-source initiatives free of charge, however that extra performance doesn’t actually compensate for the bigger open-source developer neighborhood on GitHub.
GitHub Desktop
GitHub Desktop, proven beneath, makes it straightforward to handle your GitHub.com and GitHub Enterprise repositories. Whereas it doesn’t implement all the options of the Git command line and the GitHub internet GUI, it does implement all of the operations you’ll do each day out of your desktop whereas contributing to initiatives. Usually, you’ll clone repos from GitHub to GitHub Desktop, sync them as wanted, create branches to your work, commit your work, and infrequently revert a number of commits.
To work with repos for which you lack commit and collaborate privileges, you sometimes begin by forking the repo on GitHub and cloning the fork to your desktop. Then you definitely add any branches you want in GitHub Desktop, commit any modifications you want, check your work, push the commits again to your distant forked repo, and eventually generate a pull request to the father or mother venture.
You’ll be able to see the Pull Request button on the higher proper of the GitHub Desktop interface. It’s also possible to see many commits within the Neo4j venture that had been merges of branches or pull requests. That’s typical of open-source initiatives with few committers and plenty of contributors.

GitHub Desktop provides you a useful GUI for including or cloning repos, navigating branches, pushing modifications, and managing pull requests.
GitHub for open-source initiatives
Open-source software program initiatives usually want methods to implement high quality management whereas nonetheless accepting contributions from outdoors the core staff of committers. The necessity for contributors is large, however bringing new contributors into the venture whereas sustaining the integrity of the codebase is a tough and probably harmful endeavor. On the similar time, the necessity for suggestions from customers of the venture can also be enormous.
GitHub has a lot of mechanisms that may assist grease the wheels of open supply initiatives. For instance, customers can add points to the venture on GitHub to report bugs or request options. Another methods name these tickets. Undertaking managers working with points can generate process lists, assign points to particular contributors, point out different contributors in order that they’re notified of modifications, add labels, and add milestones.
To contribute to a venture, you mainly begin from a subject head department that comprises the dedicated modifications that you really want added to the venture base department and initialize a pull request from the top department, as proven beneath. Then you definitely push your commits and add them to the venture department. Different contributors can evaluation your proposed modifications, add evaluation feedback, contribute to the pull request dialogue, and add their very own commits to the pull request.
As soon as everybody concerned is proud of the proposed modifications, a committer can merge the pull request. The merge can protect all of the commits, squash all modifications right into a single commit, or rebase the commits from the top department into the bottom department. If the merge generates conflicts, you may resolve them on GitHub or utilizing the command line.
Code evaluations on GitHub permit a distributed staff to collaborate asynchronously. Helpful GitHub instruments for reviewers embrace diffs (the decrease half of the screenshot beneath), historical past (the higher half), and blame view (a approach to view the evolution of a file commit by commit). Code discussions on GitHub go into feedback which might be offered in step with your code modifications. If the built-in instruments don’t suffice to your venture, you may add code evaluation and steady integration instruments from the GitHub market. Market add-ons are sometimes free for open supply initiatives.

GitHub offers a lot of helpful views into your code together with a commit historical past (high) and a diff view (backside).
GitHub gists
Gists are particular GitHub repositories for sharing your work (public) or for saving work for later reuse (secret). They’ll comprise single recordsdata, components of recordsdata, or full purposes. You’ll be able to obtain gists, clone them, fork them, and embed them.
Public gists may be found and located in searches. You should utilize key phrases to slender down what you discover, together with prefixes to limit the outcomes to gists from particular customers, gists with no less than N stars, gists with particular filenames, and so forth.
Secret gists should not searchable, however anybody with the URL can see them. If you happen to really need your code to be protected, use a non-public repository.
As we’ve seen, GitHub offers Git repositories as a service, together with options for code evaluation, venture administration, integrations with different developer instruments, staff administration, social coding, and documentation. Whereas GitHub will not be the one product in its class, it’s the dominant repository for open-source software program growth.